Purveyor of fine fantasy adventures

Category: books (Page 1 of 29)

Project Read the TBR: mid-year check in

I’ve been reading books from my TBR for over six months now, and I’m keeping myself accountable by posting periodically what I’ve read. We’re closing in on the end of July now so that seems as good a time as any to bring you all up to date.

Without further ado, here’s the tally since the end of May:

 

As you can see, I have read sixteen TBR books since my last update, but my Goodreads shelf ‘Mount Toberead’ only reduced by eight to 111. Either I have been remiss in keeping it up to date, or I actually have more books waiting to be read than I realised. Oh dear.

Fortunately, last weekend Rob helped me rearrange the bookshelves so that all my unreads are in one place, which has made it much easier to go through them all. I discovered several books I had been gifted and hadn’t added to the list, plus a couple erroneously marked as read which shouldn’t have been. Mount Toberead now numbers 119 again.

On the one hand, yay, more to read! But on the other, ugh, I’m not going to get it cleared this year, which means the TBR will get out of hand again. As a consequence of Project Read the TBR, I have discovered some two dozen new series I had been sleeping on, and now want to continue. The Tower and Knife, Spellcrackers, Eternal Sky, The Divine Cities, Livi Talbot, Rook & Rose, Redwinter et al, I’m looking at you.

But honestly, what a delightful problem to have.

 

Featured image © Elspeth Cooper

 

How do you like yours?

Bookshelves, that is, not your breakfast eggs. Do you stuff books in anywhere there’s room, or do you have a system?

The reason I ask is, I was scrolling Instagram and came across this piece on Bookriot. Seriously, have a look; it’s fun, but make sure you read all the way to the end.

It got me thinking about how I organise my bookshelves – or rather, how I don’t. Yes, I know, I am an utter barbarian. No, I don’t care. Nobody needs to find a book here but me. My one rule about shelving is that series should stay together, regardless of format. That’s it.

You see, when I was but a junior bookworm, I had limited shelf space, but mad Tetris skills. My books were therefore arranged to maximise storage capacity, whilst still keeping the parts of each series in contact with one another. Once I had a house of my own, I had room to ease up on the double-stacking, but other than that, the only nod towards organisation was to keep the fantasy books and general fiction separate.

Then we bought the current house, and installed bookcases with non-adjustable shelves – something of a rookie error. It was further compounded by letting my husband Rob take charge of filling them. Bless his compulsively-organised, neat-freak heart, he chose to shelve the hardcovers and the paperbacks separately, by size.

 

Photo of three large bookshelves filled with (mostly) hardback books. If you look closely, there is a full set of Gollanc Masterworks on the rightmost top two shelves, but that's not important right now.

Our bookshelves circa Novermber 2015. My books on the left and middle bookcases, Rob’s on the right.

Yes, it was tidy but . . . Historical fiction was next to spy thrillers. Women’s fiction and memoir were cheek-by-jowl with fantasy. My Pratchetts were split across two bookcases because the first 10 or so are in mass-market softcovers, the rest in hardback – ditto The Wheel of Time. Several other series are in the paperback bookcase but on separate shelves due to a mix of A and B format. And Memory, Sorrow and Thorn, which I have as mass-market, followed by trade paperback, then by hardback, was distributed across bookcases in three different rooms.

Oh boy.

Rainbow coloured silicon muffin cases stacked in random order. This is very, very wrong.

No.

Two sets of rainbow coloured muffin cases stacked as the good lord intended it, in colour-spectrum order

This is the way.

I couldn’t adequately articulate the sheer wrongness of it to me, and Rob didn’t get why it bothered me so much. But then he also doesn’t get why tea-towels must be folded with the printed design on the outside, or why only one of these stacks of silicon muffin cases is correct.

Or am I just  weird? On second thoughts, don’t answer that.

As you can probably guess, I will not ever be sorting my books by colour. Unfortunately, neither will I be shelving series together (except those I was able to buy all in the same format), because now that I’ve got used to them, Rob’s way of organising the bookshelves does look very nice.

But if anyone thinks that because of that I treat the books as purely decorative, they’re mistaken. My books are old friends. Every time I look at them I remember our shared adventures. That “photo album” effect is one of the things I miss the most about switching to ebooks. Maybe it’s why the shelf rearrangement bothered me: it shuffled all the familiar pictures around, and changed the narrative. No doubt when we next move house and everything’s boxed/unboxed again, I’ll have the same reaction.

So how do you shelve your books? Alphabetically by author, by genre, by vibes? Does the result have to be aesthetically pleasing, or merely useful?

Just don’t argue with me about the muffin cups, okay?

All images by Elspeth Cooper
« Older posts

© 2024 Elspeth Cooper

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑